blueginko
lab report rubric
Report Grading Rubric
Science labs provide you with a "hands-on" opportunity to actually practice what you are studying. The best results occur when the labs are followed exactly as outlined. Do not be in a rush - take your time and observe what is or isn't happening.
The following rubric will be used to evaluate all laboratory reports:
| Points | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Title and Hypothesis | Relevant title included. Hypothesis clearly stated. |
Title not relevant. Hypothesis clearly stated. |
Title missing or unclear. Hypothesis clearly stated. |
Title missing or unclear. Hypothesis unclear. |
Both conditions missing |
| Materials | All materials and quantities listed. List is bulleted and easy to read. |
All materials and quantities listed. List is difficult to read. |
Materials or quantities missing. List is bulleted and easy to read. |
Materials or quantities missing. List is unorganized and hard to read. |
All conditions missing |
| Methods | Details listed in sequential order. Diagram or flow chart included. |
Details listed in sequential order. Diagram not included. |
Details out of order or missing. Diagram included |
Details out of order or missing. Diagram not included |
All conditions missing |
| Results | Observations recorded in detail. Raw data listed using correct units. |
Observations recorded in detail. Raw data missing or with incorrect units. |
Some observations not recorded. Raw data listed using correct units. |
Some observations not recorded. Raw data missing. |
All conditions missing |
| Conclusions | Prediction versus results summary provided. Conclusions are accurate. Statement of support or rejection present. |
Prediction versus results summary provided. Conclusions are accurate. No statement of support or rejection. |
Prediction versus results summary provided. Conclusions are inaccurate. No statement of support or rejection present. |
Two conditions are missing or inaccurate | All conditions missing |
| Aesthetics | Thoughts well organized. All sections contain titles. No spelling and/or grammatical errors. |
Thoughts well organized. All sections contain titles. One or two spelling and/or grammatical errors. |
Not well organized. All sections contain titles. Several spelling and/or grammatical errors. |
Not well organized. Section titles missing. Several spelling and/or grammatical errors. |
Lacks organization. Missing section titles. Multiple spelling and/or grammatical errors |